Q:
We own a three thousand-gallon pond and every month we
do a 10% water change. We have talked to other hobbyists and some say they do a
water change and others say they do not change any of the pond water. My
question is: When changing water in a pond how much and how often should it be
changed, if at all?
A:
Nature’s waters are abundant in biological materials,
ranging from microscopic organisms too large aquatic plants and animals
including fish. The presence of plants and animals in the aquatic environment
means that there are also organic and inorganic byproducts being mineralize
from solid organic materials from living or dead tissue. These breakdown
products include humic acid, oils, waxes, assorted hydrocarbons, and fatty
acids “all invisible residues that affect water quality. Although, it does not
matter whether it is a lake, river, or the vast oceans, the waste generated by fish,
our aquatic animals and plants do not accumulate to any significant extent the
sheer volume of water of the habitat is diluting it. The pollution concentrations
are also eradicated and diluted largely in cases such as rivers and natural
pond waters, since freshwater is renewing it constantly through the
intersection of topography, being stream-fed with freshwater, rainwater, and
meltwater from ice or snow.
However, the typical ornamental pond operates as a closed
recirculation system, with the same water remaining in the pond for weeks or
months at a time, even if it rains frequently this will make an insignificant
difference. In this situation water quality is always a problem because as time
passes various physical, chemical, and biological processes working in and
around the pond alters the initial tabula rasa characteristics of the water.
In an enclosed ecosystem
such as our ponds, a void of an overabundance of plants and ion nutrient users,
most hobbyists think they can make their ponds oligotrophic in nature, but this
is much harder than one thinks to achieve. Because; most of the time filtration
systems are inadequate at the removal of pollutants generated by the
inhabitants and clean highly oxygenated water is dependent upon the filtration
systems capabilities and the amount of water that is being exchanged by the
hobbyists periodically.
There is little argument
whether a periodic partial water change is necessary to maintain a healthy pond
that fish can live in without undue stress. I also think that all hobbyists
would agree that all ponds would benefit from more frequent water changes and
generally this would be “the more frequent the better.” However, how much water
should be renewed and how often should such changes take place are often a
matter of discrepancy. Finding unambiguous answers to these questions in
hobbyists’ books and monthly periodicals may become a crapshoot at best. Too
many hobbyists do not understand the mathematical equations used to determine
whether water changes would become beneficial or redundant in an enclosed
ecosystem such as our ponds.
One thing hobbyists must understand is the idiom Pollutant Equilibrium (or PE for short). Pollutant Equilibrium means that
the amount of pollutants that are being produced by the animals, plants, filter
and the amount the water that is exchanged from periodic water changes will
reach what is called a steady state or constant state. This means when a steady
income of pollutants are being produced at a given rate and water is being
exchanged at a given rate that everything will remain on an equilibrium with
each other and nothing will increase or decrease over a given time. If
pollutants overshadow the amount of water being exchanged then the amount of
pollutants will increase over time to toxic levels even though a constant
amount of water is being replaced. This arises due to inadequate filtration
systems the hobbyist thought would work for their fish load.
For example; let’s say you have a pond, for the sake of argument will say this pond is
3000 gallons, that is producing 8-ppm (ppm = parts per million) of nitrogen (NO3)
every month, this now becomes a constant. The hobbyist now wishes to
reduce this nitrogen compound by doing a water change on a monthly basis. If
the hobbyists were to do a 50 percent water change, this now would halve the amount
of pollutants to 4-ppm (0+8)-50%= 4). However, do not forget that every month
the NO3 levels will begin again to elevate another 8-ppm. In addition, you must
include the NO3 compounds that were remaining from the last water change. The
next month will make the pollutant level elevate to 12-ppm before a water
change (4+8)-50%=6). The next month after that it will elevate to 14-ppm (6+8)-50%=7)
and so on in their pond. It would now take eight months before a PE is then
reached.
Then every month afterwards, the Nitrogen compounds being
produced, and the amount of water being exchange would be in equilibrium with
each other, and would remain at a constant 15.9-ppm NO3 levels or a steady
state. As you can see the hobbyists even after conducting a 50 percent water change
of 1500-gallons, may still run into problems with cyanobacteria and algae
buildup, as green water in the pond. Because their nitrogen compounds have now
exceeded the safety margin of keeping nitrates below the 15-ppm limit every
month before a water change is executed.
If the same hobbyists were
only to do 20% water change every month, it would take over sixteen months before
a PE would be reached of 39.0-ppm NO3 levels. If the water changes were only 10%,
calculation similar to those used above, would show the ensuring situation deteriorating
even further, with the pollutants stabilizing at 20 times the amount generated
from one water change to the next. Besides, the PE values differing with
different extent of water being change the time it takes for PE to be reached
also differs. In reality, doing a water change of anything less than 40 percent
would be useless in anybody’s pond. The consequences of increasing or decreasing
the frequency of water changes or the volume of water replaced on each occasion
would only be anyone’s guess. Do to the fact the hobbyists not knowing the
exact aleatory nature of the biomass and how much pollutant matter is being
generated in a single day of the pond existence.
Therefore, with the information that we now know regarding the buildup
of pollutants and routine partial water changes we can conclude the following.
Starting with pure unpolluted water, pollutants in the pond will progressively
increase with time, even as partial water changes continue at regular intervals.
However, this increased does not continue unabated but stabilize as it reaches
PE. The greater the proportion and the shorter the régime-time between each
renew water change the lower the PE would be and the shorter the time it will
take the PE goal to be reached. As you can see, winning the battle against
pollutants in an enclosed biotope such as our ponds seems almost to be futile1. This is because the amount of nitrogenous wastes produced is
many times greater than the pond’s natural capacity to absorb it.
However, one of the biggest
weapons we have in our arsenal which is in our favor is a well-designed filtration
system, which we can implement in the battle against the pollutants. Now we come
down to the one big problem that all hobbyists are faced with and that is “the
well-designed filtration system.” Since this is easier said than done the hobbyists
are left with no other alternative than to do partial water changes in their
pond.
Even with the Anoxic Filtration System, as good as it is still
needs to have at least two partial water changes made each year. Generally, the
greater proportion of water that is changed during the filter cleanout the
lower the stabilizing pollutant level in the pond would be. Because of this filtration
systems capability, the Pollutant
Equilibrium levels are reached within a short
time-span of weeks instead of months, without all the frustrating water changes
and the cost of doing them. From what we have learned, the hobbyist that does
10 percent water changes would hardly be worth the endeavor or their valuable
time.
1: The fact is that the actual ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate
levels in a fully recirculating biotope such as our ponds that requires
supplementary biological filtration is never zero “even if the filter design
ensures 100 percent inorganic compound removal effectiveness. There is always
some trace amount of these compounds in bulk water because the fish are constantly
adding ammonia (fish continuously excrete ammonia through their gills, as well
as through diluted urine) and other organic compounds to the water body proper.
The filter can only remove ammonia and nitrites from that small portion of the
pond water that is moving through it at any given time. So, even as one portion
of the pond water is being cleansed
of these compounds, another part is being polluted at the same time.
No comments:
Post a Comment